'Rightes'? you are crazy.

George that's a pretty lame comeback in terms of Edwards. You're much better than that.

As far as the people Edwards surrounded himself with, you're referring to the foreign policy people that Stoller said Edwards is looking to when in fact he isn't looking to them at all and they aren't even remotely affiliated with his campaign?

Ok, so we can forget about that one. Now let's look at who Edwards REALLY surrounds himself with. Who's his campaign manager? David Bonior, one of the most progressive voices we've had in the house and not just a friend of labor, but someone who could proudly call himself part of the labor movement.

And you notice that I didn't attack anything about HRC's foreign policy positions or advisors. I'm talking domestic issues here. I stated that I'd feel better about her candidacy if Mark Penn, one of, if not the most trusted advisor in her campaign, was not a union buster.

But instead of addressing this you throw back at me some unsubstantiated charges against Edwards to make it look like "they're all dirty". Ok, that's one way to address it, but perhaps you could address the substance of the criticism too. Do you think it's Ok that HRC's top advisor is advising a very large company on how avoid unionization of their 17,000 employees? Do you think such a person really shares our core Democratic and Progressive values? Do you think such a person might influence HRC's campaign in such a way so as to reflect corporate values that he upholds rather than the public values and worker values that are the foundation of the modern Democratic Party?

Doesn't it bother you a little bit that he's doing this?

 Good catch.  Just yesterday the media was all buttery about Edwards, made him out to be  the winner of the debate,  according to Tarheel.   What happened to that theme?  

including people who hate her like Huffington gave the win to Hillary

Don't try to use logic, markay.  They probably STILL followed the media spin, just did not want to admit it to the pollsters for some undefined reason Tarheel probably will tell you more about.   :-)

There's no reason to talk about issues or her positions to irrationl diehard Hillary haters from the left just as there's no reason to debate with right wingers on Hillary.

Hillary supporters talk about issues/her positions to undecided, those who have doubt about her candidacy but not in an irrational way.

To all Hillary haters, whether they are from the left or right, the only way they will listen is to beat them, and beat them multiple times.

what is desperateand laughable is what the "Hillary inevitability team" is trying to do on the netroots.

Oh you mean like speak our minds? I didn't realize there was a ban on having honest opinions and countering the misinformation about whom we think will be the best presidential candidate.

Instead of talking issues or responding to story's about Penn

Oh yes, let's talk about Mark Penn, a pollster for the Hillary campaign who worked in different capacities during his career: once even as an executive at Eli Lilly. God, I'm frightened. That must mean anything he's ever done in his life Hillary must have supported. Yeah sure.

they constantly harp on polls that are not very important, including the one Obama leads as a reason for others to join the bandwagon.

Oh okay, so the ones that show Hillary in the lead, that is, most and let me not confuse you: the overwhelming majority of polls that show Hillary leading are not very important but the few that show statistically significant differences from the majority of studies are?

They ignore or spin polls...

Generally, one should think for himself or herself and not just paraphrase and repeat the findings of x blogger who has anonymous credentials but who can write a scathing criticism of anyone that coincidentally falls apart underneath even the most cursory fact check.

... or focus groups that don't fit thier talking points.

If voters for Hillary are notorious for ignoring focus groups, then I say Amen. Once again, people should be able to make their own minds. As for public sentiment, that remains to be seen. For now, it looks like Hillary's on her way to win the nomination.

People who are buying the line that Obama's the anti-war candidate need to know that he's supported the war with his votes at every opportunity before he voted against the capitulation bill.  Everyone knows Edwards voted for the war four years ago.  Now everyone needs to know Obama has voted for it since.